Conservatives believe that the alleged radicalism of Obama will lead him to violate the 2nd amendment of the U. S. Constitution. They argued that he wants to take away the right to bear arms. Obama, to his foes, is more than willing to use the power of the state to oppress individuals and strip them of their liberties. Therefore, they believe it is logical to assume that President Obama wants to take away the right to bear arms and make it a group right exclusively held by the government. Added to their concerns that he would take this right away is the president’s perceived favoritism as follows:
· Pitting 95 percent of the population against 5 percent on tax policy.
· Opposition against nuclear power and free trade.
· Tendency to raise taxes on the self-employed, job makers, and other Marxist venues.
Obama’s radicalism against the individual right to bear arms goes back to 1999 when he pushed for prohibitions against the operation of any gun store within five miles of a school or park. This action once approved according to gun rights advocates would eliminate gun stores from most of the inhabited portions of the United States. In 2000, Obama sponsored a bill limiting handgun purchases to one per month. By 2004, as a state senator, he voted against a 2004 measure that allowed self-defense as an affirmative defense to those changed with violating local laws that make it unlawful for such persons to possess firearms. That same year, Obama voted against allowing persons who had obtained domestic violence protective orders to carry handguns for their protection. Once in the U. S. Senate, Obama supported several gun control measures, including restrictions on the purchase of firearms at gun shows and reauthorization of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban. Significantly, he voted against legislation protecting firearm manufacturers from certain liability suits (Ibid).
Other conservative voices weighed in on the perceived indoctrination speech. Rowley and Laura Ingram compared Obama’s school year address to what Chairman Mao did. The message conveyed; these commentators believe, is that dictators, like Obama, and their totalitarian regimes are saviors of children. To strengthen his argument, Beck connected Obama’s address to Mussolini’s indoctrination and propaganda. On the Fox Nation, the host encouraged the audience to keep your children home the day the speech is made. Chris Stigall filling in for Lou Dobbs told the audience that Obama was trying to mold their children into a discussion and way of thinking that is contrary to family and U. S. values (See Image 7). If parents allow their children to listen to the speech the children, Stigall believes, they would become lackeys of his indoctrination. Russ Limbaugh called the speech indoctrination to the cult of personality used by Kim Jong II and Saddam Hussein. Mark Steyn on the Russ Limbaugh show stated that public education is a useful tool for getting children to be good subjects of big government when they grow up comparable to lessons taught to the young Obama in Chicago by radical William Ayers (Media Matters).
For more information click this link: http://rojimerson.tripod.com/drjimersonslatestbooks/ Obama's Radicalism and Indoctrination or Amazon Books and Kindle under the author's name: Dr. Rufus Jimerson.
No comments:
Post a Comment